Research, page-798

You might have done well to heed my advice.

There is something called deep knowledge. Generally a DOCTOR might have some (as outlined in my original comment). When someone comments who isn't just a yuppie boomer investor and has deep knowledge in the industry you might want to listen next time.

This project is a long term (5-10 years) slow burn changing gold standard practice within the most stoic profession on the planet. The management must prioritize university and specialist training program support if they want any hope to have this tech adopted; alongside an incredible KOL global education and marketing strategy (the current one is sh!t) and a pivot to trials and doc training programs in developing economies (where hospitals do NOT already have CT machines). 4DMedical is always talking about hospital partnerships but that means f*ck all when physicians get paid by insurance and medicaid/ medicare/ private patients. Oh this is such a farce. Hospitals can't dictate ANYTHING in terms of diagnosis or treatment. Legally. That is all up to the doctors. Hospitals could buy billion dollar equipment for doctors to use and say "it's the best" in massive letters in the tea room with studies out the wazoo touting the efficacy, but without training; incentives and personal clinician experience with the tech (super hard to achieve) that billion dollar equipment would go massively underutilized. Hospital partnerships don't matter! How doctors perform their role of diagnosis or treatment is based on their training and experience; ie what they know, and what they learn. All hospitals can do is provide the facilities which enable doctors to do their jobs in the MOST productive manner (what makes the most money for the hospital; and the doctor). As I said in my prior comments - the western hospitals already have CT. This is more radiation but it's already an available standard of care in the west; and way more revenue generating than what 4DX has to offer.

Why actually are existing doctors going to use this tech in the west when they already have a CT that they can already read which gets the job done. There is no problem here for the doctors, this is an equal technology (with less radiation) that needs to be "sold" based on the moral appeal for 4DX. Ie; using the radiation idiom of ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) when supporting the training of new grad MD's and specialists. That is at least an in road to the tertiary path to change the way doctors are thinking.

PHYSICIANS - DOCTORS are where the technology matters. Gosh it would have been faster to concentrate all resources on sponsoring university graduates instead of hospitals. Partnerships with hospitals could mean 4DX executives play golf with hospital directors for all we know.

But hell who am I to pass judgement. Someone said my comments were all a bit "doom and gloom". Well, yes actually this stock was a steaming pile of $hit at $2.20 where I said to sell, so well done if you realized.

If anyone reading this wants to watch a movie that's a metaphor for 4DX's technology, look at the medical machine Will Smith's character tries to sell during the "Persuit of Happyness".