BW writing style is unmistakable—sarcastic, confrontational, and...

BW writing style is unmistakable—sarcastic, confrontational, and let’s face it, almost allergic to optimism.

Every time BW mentions AW1, BW come at it with the same tired tune: comparisons to other mystery unnamed copper stocks, questions about cheap shares, and a healthy dose of skepticism about management. It’s like you’re on repeat, always probing the same points in the hope of forcing someone into a corner. BW has made his doubts about AW1 crystal clear, but constantly hammering on cashflow or past highs just to discredit any optimism? That’s not analysis—it’s cynicism, plain and simple. Probably based on Donald Trump's failed election campaign formula.

BW throws out data here and there but never miss an opportunity to dismiss the potential for anything positive. I mean, I get it—you’re positioning yourself as the cold realist, the one who “sees through the hype.” But at some point, this has to move beyond rhetorical questions and deflections. I get the sense you’re not just doubtful about AW1—you’re almost committed to tearing it down for anyone who sees the potential. Anti-development mindset.

BW informal, conversational style is entertaining, no doubt, but let’s not mistake sarcasm for insight. It’s easy to sit back, undermine others with lines like "You fell for the hype last August" or question their judgment with personal digs. But seriously, what’s your angle? Grow up. You’re quick to deflect any optimism with the same critical tone, but what do you actually propose? Because at this point, all you’re doing is stirring the pot without offering much substance.