Q:
is anyone aware of the location of the two 'contentious' monitoring bores in relation to each other?
and if adjacent to each other,
is it possible that with the negative cavity pressure created during the short burn, that the negligible contamination to the monitoring bores may have been drawn into same from a remote area/location other than that which is being insinuated as being produced from the activities at the burn site.
diggin for other than peanuts/
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?