re: resolution 3 for agm-rjcesq they could have done this share placement when the sp was much higher so I don't think I agree with you about their motives. However I do think that the spp should have been limited to current holders ,like for example the QGC spp ,as a nice bonus for holders. Also,all their other licences have been approved why not uranium?
RTM
reefton mining nl
resolution 3 for agm, page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)