response from qld premier, page-6

Rob, Len would probably have 30 years more scientific experience than the 'acting assistant' lady who rejected the environmental evaluation. I doubt it would of been 'flawed' more likely 'over her head'.

The 1 monitoring bore on the CXY site that is unused by anyone except CXY for monitoring, recorded 2 ppb of benzene against Aus drinking water guidelines of 2 ppb (WHO 10ppb). How is this a contamination if the bore is undrinkable anyway? I would argue that the stringent 2ppb guidelines should not apply or be lifted.

How did it occur? How do you prove this? Who's to say some smarty pants up the road didn't pour a heap of benzene in the bore prior to testing? The casing broke also as we know, maybe that was the cause, maybe not? If this was the cause I'm sure Len and the rest of the advisors from Ergo could have explained it. How also does a lab make such an error of 40 times the actual result of benzene. Accidentally on purpose perhaps it was orchastrated from the fat walleted QGC? Just seems too suspicious and convenient.