response from qld premier, page-9

great effort mate,

which only brings up the next question on a guess about how long ago this articulate 'form letter' was drafted by the spin-miesters for anticipated distribution, for an accident that didn't happen in order to provide a bunch of trumped up reasons for a convenient shut-down of operations.

the basis for the shut-down was based on a single proven falsehood,
therefore,
there is NO legit. reason to deny a request to re-commence operations IOHO.

the plot thickens
and,
"conspiracy is not always a theory"

now which paddock are the belgiuns grazing in and where's our coil of rope, because there's a lab-rat required for attendance at a rip-roaring party because we need some solid answers and not this beating around the bush effort delaying decision until they come up with a solution on how they are going to attend the salinity and aquifer de-watering problem associated with CSG.

do they have a problem with the anachrosisms?

UCG is NOT CSG in any shape or form,
or is a just a case of:
"are there none so deaf as those that don't want to hear".

http://qcl.farmonline.com.au/news/state/agribusiness-and-general/general/csg-water-impacts-are-next-in-line-robertson/1924238.aspx