The readings below of recent postings are the most neuralgic...

The readings below of recent postings are the most neuralgic experiences for me on this forum.

-- Content Moderated Comments on post: Why are you getting so personal in your posting style toward other members? Also, please be careful what you imply on this forum & I would also ask you to re-read the HCDG as you alone are responsible for the content in your posts. TIA. (http://hotcopper.com.au/hc_defamationguide.asp)
OR THIS
Comments on post: If you didn't make posts like this that are baiting/flaming in nature then you wouldn't have received the baiting/flaming response you got in reply. Please re-read the HC PG's. Thanks.
OR THIS
-- Content Moderated -- Comments on post: please be careful with what words you choose. Scathing criticism is ok but defamation is not. You stepped a little too close to the line. the name calling here didn't help your cause. Please read our defamation guide.

Instead, we need more of the readings of the type of the latest Plumbob posting on Submission 282, as an example.

Rather than interrogating fellow unit holders of their bona-fides as a unitholder, we should be welcoming all reasonable and helpful comments however disagreeable they may be to ones personal logic.
I regret to see posters like Gardner35 retract their post
in an apparent reaction to perceived intimidation on the forum.

We had an absolute nullity of a reaction on suggestion of
promoting our demand to freeze PIF asset sales to preserve the remaining values.

Posts resulting in Moderators's censures as shown above far outnumber those calling for PIF protection.

I appeal again to show real and genuine concern for PIF
members and whatever positives that can still be extracted from this situation.

Regards,

PS: the Inquiry submissions posted so far on their site are really educative, often a fascinating and revealing read.