There is an ASX document on this page called Corporate...

There is an ASX  document on this page called  Corporate Principles and Governance. Here is the contents table.


You can decide for yourself whether these principles have been adhered to by EPM's directors.

As Ive said before it looks like the dead wood needs to be removed, given they appear to have done hardly anything over time, and this  been unaccountable for the salaries they draw from shareholders funds. They do not even answer emails or telephone enquiries  made by shareholders. Nor do they maintain the website.

Directors of a company must call and arrange to hold a general meeting on the request of members with at least 5% of the votes that may be cast at the general meeting.  For a requisition of a general meeting to be valid it must:

• be in writing;
• state any resolution to be proposed at the meeting;
• be signed by the members making the request; and
• be given to the company.

The resolution would be to remove directors. Some  or all. The question  is do we have enough interest in making any changes here, or not?  One of the top 20 holders used to post here about 10 months ago, we should get him/her on board.  Anyone remember their handle?

For some comparison, pop over to TNG, one of their directors is about to be booted because of a disgruntled top 20 s/holder.