Reynolds v. Higgins, page-10

regardless think Higgins has been playing silly games more recently. I found it breathtaking that she asked the court to delay hearings on the defamation case so she could get married. She’s been stubborn in her position ( in response to reynolds own stubbornness). Then we have sharaz’s response to the case, the existence of the protective trust. It’s evasive. It’s no surprise therefore that reynolds had persisted. Legal bills must be huge. For what?