what that decision is intended to do is to provide information about that trust fund and I’d say there will be subsequent requests made. It’s different from lehrman’s situation to the extent that the payout was public information and there is a gross disparity between her asset declaration and the payout figure
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Reynolds v. Higgins
what that decision is intended to do is to provide information...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)