Reynolds v. Higgins, page-32

"if the court finds she has been defamed by Higgins and Sharaz". ..... and in this I entirely agree.

we aren't really in a position to judge ourselves. none of us know the full picture. thats what the judge must discern.

Higgins has not previously presented as a 'reliable' witness. I doubt she herself, if she gets in the chair, will present a coherent story, even if she is well rehearsed. whether Reynolds can present in a coherent manner is only beginning to be shown. but given that she's a party apparatchik, as a senator she is not voted for by the public/electorate, the senate is mostly ticking a box for the party, she's liable to be poorly substantiated with facts.

I'm happy to suppose and opine on this but I'm equally happy to watch each evening and wait for the judge to decide.