Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Her costs are close to $2 million. At best she recovers the...

First 40 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
redzanti

1,307 Posts.

24/08/24

12:52

Post #: 75355278
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag: ↑

reading tonight that Reynolds has won the right to access Higgins payout trust account with the aim of having Reynolds' legal costs covered.

is this about revenge? is Reynolds simply determined to deprive Higgins of her workers compensation payout?

if there is a hint of such a motive.... well praps someone with legal knowledge can clear that up for me.

Expand

Her costs are close to $2 million.

At best she recovers the costs and defamation itself will be very little. From a logical point of view not worth it. If she fails then what was the point? That's $2 million in cost to pay plus the other side.

It's not a rational choice to sue.

Last edited by redzanti: 24/08/24
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Making money: How many microcaps should be in an investor's portfolio?

'We're looking': Nickel-rich Indonesia sounds graphite warning to Aus producers

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too

The Altcoin Landscape (Part 1): Key alternative cryptocurrencies to watch

What each US election outcome would mean for Australian companies & investors

MIN

Movers and Shakers: Zip Co, MinRes, Kuniko, more – The week's top ASX gainers

Aussie inflation seemingly hit a 3 year low. So why's the ASX200 red?

MKT

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

Week 44 Wrap: Relatively boring week ahead of US election; HotCopper's most watched; Oz inflation at 3.5%

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

There are more pages in this discussion • 64 more messages in this thread...

First 40 Last