of course it was a breach of security.
he couldn't be sacked over an allegation of sexual assault by a junior staffer.
but i'll stick by my memory as to the timing of him being let go: ie within days of the alleged assault occurring. From memory the CoS flicked him.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Reynolds v. Higgins
of course it was a breach of security.he couldn't be sacked over...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 42 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)