Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Reynolds v. Higgins, page-80

First 80 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
UniversalTrader

19,346 Posts.

56

27/08/24

12:55

Post #: 75394185
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag: ↑

"BH et al has violated Linda's reputation that is without question". ....... so Higgins "violated" Reynolds? apparently the twits were merely drunken ramblings. nothing more.

Reynolds reputation has never been good, so how could Higgins get al "violate" anything that others might think or say about Reynolds.

if you claim violation you need to be able to prove how such violation occurred. did her polling slip? were people talking scathingly of her as a consequence?

and what difference would such gossip that might occur make to her reputation when she's already resigned from her senatorial role? what harm was caused too Reynolds by these little SM squarks?

Expand

lol always with the lw defence.
There is more proof of what was done to Linda than BH. We have no idea what really happened behind closed doors for BH but we have seen the nasty smears publicly against Linda
8 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

COD

Coda Minerals (ASX:COD) enters rights issue to further exploration in South Australia

RCE

Recce eyes Indonesia for novel anti-infective as Indo-Aus ties grow stronger

FFM

Firefly positioned for copper growth in Canada ahead of resource update

CC9

Chariot Corp unveils plans for Black Mountain "pilot mine" in Wyoming, US; shares jump +20%

ACW

Actinogen Medical ramps up Alzheimer’s treatment trials, targeting fast-track global approvals

There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...

First 80 Last