Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Reynolds v. Higgins, page-9

First 9 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

58,397 Posts.

666

18/07/24

00:09

Post #: 74803155
Share

Originally posted by Parsifal: ↑

I don’t think it’s about revenge at all. The decision allows Reynolds to know details about the trust account. Who the trustee is, basis for the trust etc. I think it’s a reasonable decision given that the trust was established immediately after the payout yet Higgins is claiming she has assets of around $10,000.

Given the size of the payout and the cost of her house in France (and she hasn’t skimped) that suggests the house too is tied up in the trust. The choice of trust type is a bit weird as well.

given the decision in the channel 10 case Higgins seems to be walking on thin ice. Maybe the reason she has resisted any settlement outside court is because she felt her money was safe and it wouldn’t matter what the decision was. That makes her less than honourable in my book rather than reynolds being vindictive

we all know that different people can have entirely different views about an event. Clearly reynolds view is very different to Higgins. None of us can know the objective truth - if there is any to be found. I imagine they both think they are right. The court will work out which one is more right than the other

Expand

true none of us can know the actual events. neither side were suitable witnesses.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

TMG

Trigg brings famed Finnish metals refiner – and its tech – onboard to bolster antimony processing

TLX

Telix sinks as US regulator SEC issues subpoena over claims

Japan tariff deal inked at 15% – as long as US gets half a trillion of investment

ASX Market Close: Iron awe keeps the XJO tracking along

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 019 – Dreaming of the 9,000s

First 9 Last