rio shows how rudd has deceived us ... , page-7

I would suggest the critical issue in this debate is: what is "a fair share" of taxes paid ?

Is 35% (quoted by RIO) a "fair share" ?

Who decides and define what is a "fair share" ? The government that theoretically represents the people ? or the companies that are being taxed ?

The phrase "fair share" has been thrown around here and out in the public, everyone seems to have a view of what is a "fair share of tax paid" ?

In my mind, this critical definition has been lost in the debate, and sadly so.