And to enforce corruption is wrong and should never be rewarded,...

First 187 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
tolate

10,549 Posts.

938

14/02/24

11:19

Post #: 72398810
Share

Originally posted by Scarpa: ↑

Yes this would have been mined in two years time without corruption meaning a mining lease was granted. What part of that don't you continue to understand? You clearly don't like answering questions.

So clearly you remain clueless as to what the key factor is that hasn't got this to mining - corruption has led to no mining lease. Exactly what am I ramping - I have stated a solution to get this moving. You have stated no solution yet btw, which infers your solution is AVZ should have a 0% stake in Dathcom. So you still refuse to answer questions.

So you know, without a resolution I want AVZ to tie this in the courts for the next 10 years. Corruption must not be rewarded is my point - it is the only way African countries like the DRC can grow and its people are rewarded and that they can stay home without seeking to flee to other countries for a better life.

And to enforce corruption is wrong and should never be rewarded, I wouldn't mind the international community preventing any exports of spodumene from ports outside the DRC were Zijin and your corrupt mates to use those ports in the absence of AVZ having a stake in Dathcom, or even confiscate that product at those ports.

I am prepared to lose the lot, so exactly what am I ramping in your opinion. I will repreat, I would be prepared to lose the lot here.

So what is your solution again? Ask your masters. Enjoy the Chow mein.

All IMO

Expand

And to enforce corruption is wrong and should never be rewarded, I wouldn't mind the international community preventing any exports of spodumene from ports outside the DRC ....LMAO

DRC....AFRICA is in the TOP 20 CORRUPT COUNTRIES in the WORLD...!!!!!!!!
So AVZ should not be rewarded dealing with a CORRUPT country.......

What a HIPPACRIT ...!!!!!!!!

AVZ Price at posting: 78.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply