because they are trashing the constitution..
Today, the Court discards that balance. It says that from the very moment of fertilization, a woman has no rights to speak of. A State can force her to bring a pregnancy to term, even at the steepest personal and familial costs.
'Discards that balance'.. after each of them had previously agreed with precedent ? This is nothing more than a hatchet job on common sense, decency and balance.. These very words cannot be interpreted as anything other than extremism.. This is what happens when a bench of the highest court gets stacked.. very disturbing
The SCOTUS have cherry picked and excluded to suit their ideals, knowing that society is divided on the issue, they chose a side.. they are playing god, playing politics
Imagine is we re wrote the above extract in the sense of gun ownership
Today the court discards that balance. It says that from the very very moment of gun ownership, an individual becomes a threat to the community. A state can force that individual to surrender that weapon and any other weapons in their possession, even if they have paid a great deal for that/those weapons and even if it upsets them emotionally and causes them a great deal of distress..
- Forums
- World Politics
- Roe v Wade Overturned
Roe v Wade Overturned, page-348
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 437 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)