ron paul wins more delegates, page-33

"Well facts are in some states they counted no votes towards Ron Paul despite him pulling crowds in the thousands"

Good - that's exactly how it should be... they counted no VOTES despite lots and lots of people going to hear him speak. So what? What exactly are you saying? That people voted for him and these votes weren't counted? If that's what you're saying then put your money where your mouth is and say so... THEN provide some evidence.... NOT circumstantial observations.... actual evidence!


"gcadenaz, that delegate count is bullcrap in the purest sense. No one knows the true count."

Um, yes they do! Hundreds of thousands of people know the true count. YOU don't know the true count. Probably because it would actually take a few hours of research and effort to dig up the actual numbers.


You see, when you get down to it, the problem is that you guys are basically saying that there is a massive, organised voter fraud going on in America and that as a result of this fraud Mitt Romney is ahead when (if the process was run legitimately) Ron Paul would be ahead.

The next problem is that you have very little hard evidence for this. Actually, that's being too kind - you have ZERO evidence for this. All you have is a gut feeling.