To expand on what @jkim78 have said. In my view:
Two interlinked issues:
1. Performance shares release.
2. The revenue that led to the performance shares release.
Now, if the revenue was legitimate then the performance shares would also be legitimate. Therefore ISX would be allowed to resume trading.
Conversely, if the revenue was deceitful then the performance shares would not be legitimate. Therefore ISX would not be allowed to resume trading. The revelation would also have further ramification in that if that revenue was deceitful then what else is deceitful? What if everything has been deceitful just like in the case with Wirecard?
Now let us have a look at the situation and try to figure which of the two outcomes is more likely.
Let's see, based what I understood after having read the SOR:
Most of the payments were made by unknown entities.
Some of the unknown entities are shared between supposedly different customers.
Some customers and unknown entities have links to Rodeler, Hoch Capital, etc.
Piecemeal payments.
Amounts of payments did not match.
Some unsigned contracts.
Hard to verify products.
Some customers were flagged by ASIC and some have been operating without proper licences.
No remittance advices.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- Round 2 ISX vs ASX
Round 2 ISX vs ASX, page-299
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,646 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SP1 (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO & Managing Director
Charles Armstrong
CEO & Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online