There is an argument that by voting "NO" to this conditional placement that retail shareholders may avoid the self interest of Mark Rowsthorn from further diluting their wealth.
Is approving Mark Rowsthorn the ability to control in excess of 10% of the company really working in the best interests of shareholders?
Stagman
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- rowsthorn - conditional placement
There is an argument that by voting "NO" to this conditional...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)