roxon again. be very afraid, page-4

  1. 8,527 Posts.
    Glug - you're right - but mandatory - legislated? Roxon, Attorney General, the overseer? (Same department who can't seem to bring forward a case on Thomson or Wilson allegations for possible charges and possible prosecution for some unknown reason?)The Thomson case has been gong on for years and years and years! With NIL outcome?

    And just who decides WHO has right of access? And adjudicates in instances of argument? WHO bestows right of access? Who is authorised to DO the act of access - and who directs their actions - hands out such authorisations - to whom do THEY report - let alone who scrutinises the scrutinisers? And what happens to the information they then extract? where does THAT end up? And how is it used? I need a coffee.

    It's police state territory - pure simple absolutely - stinks of the KGB/China communist thuggery model - and that Police State summation was a much vaunted opinion when this worrying issue was discussed by various officials last night on a respected TV panel discussion.

    Roxon - not Pollyanna, Goody Two Shoes, or Nanny any more. She's now wading into very deep and murky waters.

    Someone ask her about Wilson and Thomson, will you? HER area, surely?
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.