As an investor new to Helium investing, this raises questions. See chart below -> as much as I like the prospectiveness of the BNL assets, I do not like the size of royalties they will have to pay once they become a producer and bring in revenue. Using the 90% likely producing assets case below, the royalty payout rate (once they are producing) is 38.1%. I assume this is an offset to taxes?
Questions:It is not necessarily a negative for the business to focus on fattening up for a sell, but I would be monitoring the business carefully for dilution and G&A expenses going forward to make sure they are taking the 'develop to sell' path in a shareholder-friendly manner.
- Is this royalty commitment normal vs comparable producing businesses?
- Is this royalty net of tax or is tax added on to this? Or, are there tax credits for such?
- Is this business competitive overall with its cost structure relative to comparable businesses?
- Would this make the business more focused on fattening up the asset to sell it to a bigger player (with no intention to actually produce in the future)?
Which way are they going?![]()
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Royalty overheads and what industry norms are to compare this too?
As an investor new to Helium investing, this raises questions....
Featured News
Add BNL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $11.66M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.6¢ | 0.7¢ | 0.6¢ | $7.242K | 1.073M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 3595780 | 0.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.7¢ | 3674071 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 3595780 | 0.006 |
32 | 9927226 | 0.005 |
22 | 9860251 | 0.004 |
7 | 7193333 | 0.003 |
8 | 6150502 | 0.002 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.007 | 3674071 | 9 |
0.008 | 5925333 | 12 |
0.009 | 5567980 | 8 |
0.010 | 3980098 | 9 |
0.011 | 3330775 | 5 |
Last trade - 15.39pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BNL (ASX) Chart |