rudd and wikileaks, page-13

  1. 8,527 Posts.
    cerhob - that's the "palm off the ants" answer - it was far more complex than that.

    Lee Harvey Oswald could well have been what he said he was - a "patsy", and maybe, in fact, was a CIA operative, very well set-up.
    Lots of intelligent analysis omes to alternate conclusions of the truth of that day.
    We'll never, ever know - unless Wikieleaks goes back THAT far!

    Let's face it - if this keeps up a lot of history could be re-written.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.