this lastest rudd fiasco is just a continuation of the problem the union bosses have with their appointed labor party frontmen.
We see the same instability and associated "problems" as we moved from latham, to rudd and now to gillard.
When the labor party "leadership" is decided in shady backroom deals by union bosses and their fellow hidden power-brokers, the attributes of the selected stooge, be it latham, rudd or gillard, that seem to be important are not those attributes that we would normally associate with leadership.
The union bosses need weakness in the labor party "leader" and absolute dependence on the power of the union-bosses for political survival.
Along with these attributes of weakness and helplessness and dependence on the union-boss masters, seems to come a certain mental instability as we have seen with latham, then with the blubbering, tantrum-throwing rudd, and now the screeching and continual lying of gillard.
Lord save us all from labor....
- Forums
- Political Debate
- rudd must go
rudd must go, page-30
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
MND
Monadelphous inks $200M contract with Woodside to help build Pluto LNG – but will it make Scarborough cheaper?
LKE
Lake Resources implies news article on job cuts made up; non-core sales "not material" and no rule 15.7 breach