etherazer, I have just looked at the so called costings, and there appears to be a pretty big error in the figures.
The $4.4b 1.5% company tax on large businesses (effectively the tax does not change) is being counted as new revenue without it first being counted as lost revenue.
When I questioned this on another thread, the usual it doesn't mater, Rudd\Labor are worse, your one of them, etc seem to be the main responses.
If there are errors, then the question will be are they an honesty or a competency issue.
Fraud may be too strong a word, but if it was intentional then deceitful would be warranted.
Someone here might be able to explain how you can cut income and increase income by the same amount, and have double the money to offset outgoings.
It may be simple, but if I give you a $1 and then get a $1 back off you, then I still only have a dollar, not $2 as the Coalition paper seems to be showing.
