rumor about swift, page-13

Now steady on there Montec. Daylight was just offering his opinions I suspect laced with some frustration. Surely by your standards, that is OK. This is not about just you but understand there are so called "fools" out there who do make decisions based on what they hear or perhaps told to them on HC and other information sites. Whether that is wrong or right, it is not for me to say really. In life,we all dance to our own tunes. The point of my post was to highlight a practice that has been used by SEN in the past to disseminate somewhat dubious information at best through these specific sources. I am not aware if you know of the sources but the majority of what does the rounds eminates from there. As a result of SEN focusing on ways of impacting the shareprice, this practice has gained momentum, very much to the detriment of sales and performance in the field. Under JD, I am sure this will change. Good on Radstan for raising it, I have absolutely no issue with freedom of speech. My issue is far more specifically directed at the SEN characaters who have taken the easy route, yet paid themselves handsomely and in the process, set the company back at least 18 months. I am not a critic of SEN the company but I am the drivers of the company. Whether I have lost money is really of no consequence to me, I am honest and upfront about that. A big boy I am and clearly understand the concept of what goes around, comes around!

At least I hope that this explains my intent re the Swift post by Radstan.