re: smuggler smuggler .... They (NEWS) are NOT buying LOOK ......

re: smuggler smuggler .... They (NEWS) are NOT buying LOOK ... How many times must I tell you. But you continue to spread false impressions.

Murdoch has advised of a "controlling interest" (ONLY) in a 'search engine', as he has described it. And LOOK are NOT for sale.

LOOK have a model (these days, if you are not familiar) that is specifically designed to suit Publisher & Media Co needs. it is based on sharing "contextualised" content with each OTHER, would you beleive??

LOOK already have THREE Majors signed and THEY would compliment the current needs of the NEWS empire. LOOK are the centre of activity and are gearing up for further involvement with many more publishers/Media Co's. It has only just begun.

David Hills has stated he is concentrating on long term value for investors. This is a new ball game, whether you understand it or, not.

Rupert would gain plenty, if he chooses to take a 'cost effective' interest in LOOK. Let me assure all of that.

Do some research. Just because "we" have 'left you out' of any news in recent times, is you own undoing. You asked for that. You are sounding very foolish in most regards, as to what is happening, that I will assure you, I will most certainly remind you of, in the future. But you are entitled to an opinion.

NEWS are very much considering Looksmart, in my opinion, of course. Do you honestly think I'm just pumping in the short term, when I have held for so long and been adding shares almost daily, in recent times.

There is a great future in LOOK.

It's purely a matter of understanding. I'm afraid, you don't.

Cheers !!

:)
LC