rumour low grades so small deposit be why sell, page-8

So how is it that we have two 'official' and totally different readings on drillhole AK 072 as posted, and brought to the attention of the thread last week.
The first one shows 1.5m @ 0.03% pU308 as announced July last year, and then we have a different result posted on the map for the same hole, BUT NOT ANNOUNCED, in the last quarterly showing 21m @ 0.148% pU308.
I'd suggest that is more than a few olympic size swimming pools of Uranium difference in any proposed JORC estimate.
These guys are meant to be the experts in the field with the best equipment money can buy. Or is it that staff issues at Heathgate/Quasar mean they've got the office boy doing the readings because they can't get enough qualified staff? And hence the delayed JORC.
We've been told that the Company is aware of the duplication/problem, so why can't it be cleared up immediately?
Which one is it - we'd like to know?
What are we to believe in the meantime?
This was raised mid last week - surely you just check the records or does the hole have to be retested?
wrxsti