What about this one: 10/5/2015 PLS = 0.05. Today PLS = 85.5c (17...

What about this one:
10/5/2015 PLS = 0.05. Today PLS = 85.5c (17 multiples)
10/5/2015 AVZ = 0.006. Today AVZ = 0.096 (16 multiples)

Or this one:
10/05/2016 PLS = 0T. Today PLS = 8.8kT. 10/05/2020 = > ? kT
10/05/2016 AVZ = 0T. Today AVZ = 0T. 10/5/2020 = > ? kT

Or this one (TE):
30/6/2017 PLS = $200M. 30/6/2018 PLS = $343M. 30/6/2019 = $??M
30/6/2017 AVZ = $31M. 30/6/2018 AVZ = $62M. 30/6/2019 = $??M

If an investor got into AVZ at 0.009 (or even 0.006) well done (I hope they took some off the table when it climbed to say mid 20c for a 40 multiple). Ditto for anyone who got into PLS at say 0.05, you’d hope that they took some off the table when it got to say $1 for a 20 multiple...of course if they got in earlier at 0.02 ... well ... different again isn’t it...

Historical comparisons of share price movement is all very exciting and emotional but there’d be those who suggest consideration of MC and surety of investment for the future is also important ... not to mention timing. Can’t deny, getting in early while there are fewer players is a great way to capitalise on emerging markets.

Hopefully the SS brings all the wanted Christmas presents. Maybe ozblue will be correct re the transport studies and preferred routes, maybe not. Maybe the Chinese will come flooding forward with funds and it progresses to feasibility studies. Maybe the (re)new(ed?) attempts to raise interest in the US will generate funds and it progresses. Either way, a lot hangs on this SS (obviously) and hopefully it brings the certainty needed for SH to work out whether to hang around, take a quick pump off the announcement or run for cover. Soon to be made more transparent I hope.

Re the referenced post here, I don’t get too excited about looking backwards because it just depends on how far back one looks. For now, I like one for the moment more than the other but that changes on market sentiment and timing... IMO and DYOR.