AVZ avz minerals limited

Running discussion on SP, page-1416

  1. 3,294 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 421
    I did like this bit. Why would we make admission to misleading or deceptive announcements to to ASIC for appease MMCS? Thus they then could have a further case of litigation? vexatious fools

    "Legal
    As previously advised, in July 2017 MMCS Strategic 1 (MMCS) filed an amended claim (Claim) seeking
    an order pursuant to the ASIC Act and the Corporations Act requiring AVZ to make announcements
    to the market to correct what MMCS claims were misleading or deceptive announcements (or
    announcements which were likely to mislead or deceive) made by AVZ concerning the Manono
    licence.
    AVZ firmly denied that any of its past announcements concerning the Manono licence were
    misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive. AVZ can confirm that pursuant to Order 2 of
    the Orders of Justice Chaney dated 3 April 2018, the proceedings were dismissed."
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.