As per usual you are stretching the truth. Lets start with the Mining Code - the royalty rate is similar to what royalty rates are in WA for lithium mines, and the mine would have closed regardless of whether a royalty rate applied here or not due to falling production and rising costs, in a climate of low cobalt prices. To repeat, the mine is shutting down because of resource exhaustion causing high opex costs, not helped by the fall in the cobalt price. The mine is not shutting down because of sovereign risk issues increasing to a new level (i.e. it hasn't, sovereign risk is unchanged) and ebola (the classic always quoted here) is my point. I wrote about this in another thread btw - Post #: 39895550
All IMOI have addressed it above. I think he was seeking to imply sovereign risk was a factor in the mine's closure, which it is not.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVZ
- Running discussion on SP
Running discussion on SP, page-21994
- There are more pages in this discussion • 59,922 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
78.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.752B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
AVZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable