“Stand on its own economics not an SEZ “ ……did you ask that at...

“Stand on its own economics not an SEZ “ ……did you ask that at the Sydney shareholders meeting and the reply?

There’s a lot to wrap one’s grey matter around….. why is an SEZ needed?

What are AVZ Manono’s economics? How might an SEZ complement AVZ’s capital expense projections, what are some of those expenses? What might explain DFIs potentially funding MLTO most financing requirements and how are they linked to the formation of the SEZ, and what’s happening within the SEZ, and how could that protect AVZ MLTO’s interests as well as the DRC’s?

How is a ‘tax holiday’ linked to Dathcom’s MLTO and SEZ activities and interests?

SEZ is a corporate legal structure to incentivise development in Manono and in the Manono region. And looking at AVZ’s capex items there’s a reason why a tax holiday in some ways is not a holiday and why DFIs are involved with speculated lower than typical commercial interest rates. So…… you might be applying the wrong optic on separating MLTO and the SEZ

All IMO & DYOR