lol, how did you get PLL from the below? I dont see how that's unclear at all, obviously talking about PLS.Thats fine of course, mistakes are made, even when re-writing an apparent quote to solidify your point. Obviously an accident because you thought he was talking about PLL. But the following effort to back up your position has been painful to watch
Running discussion on SP, page-48372
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 35,446 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)