The Corporations Act REQUIRES Eckhof to care. As a director he is legally obliged to act in the best interests of the company. Decimating the ability of the company to raise capital with minimal dilution is contrary to this and accordingly the guy has opened himself to civil suit. Especially as he very publically admitted (in the press) he was selling for personal gain with full awareness of the effect on SP.
Irony of ironies, he could well get sued for more than the sale value of his shares.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Running discussion on SP
The Corporations Act REQUIRES Eckhof to care. As a director he...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 75,443 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
78.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.752B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
AVZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
RDN
RAIDEN RESOURCES LIMITED
Dusko Ljubojevic, MD
Dusko Ljubojevic
MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online