Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

AVZ

Click for more information

0.00%

78.0¢ avz minerals limited

The mining license is issued to Dathcom, not AVZ and AVZ by the...

First 70086 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
259774

17 Posts.

9

04/05/22

17:57

Post #: 61206995
Share
Originally posted by sf120: ↑

it is, and I took it as an opportunity to research more about my blind faith in ASX Announcement being legally strong. What i found is alot of background noise around Zinjin and their dealings in Congo. They all look suspicious at best.

What i also found is a company that HAS a Mining License. A license that can only be given if they prove 4 pillars
Environmental approval;
Proof of financial capability;
Favourable cadastral opinion; and
Favourable technical opinion.

Within that is legal ownership - you wouldnt award a license to someone that doesnt own it right?

So we know by virtue being awarded the license that all conversations related to how we got our 75% is done and dusted.

That only leaves legal wranglings on the remaining 25% of which 10% is given to DRC; leaving 15%

news flash - We never had the 15% remaining, it was never guaranteed and the market I do not believe factored that in. No NPV/ No research report really spoke about this as the value offering

It appears Zinjin managed to steal first rights at the 15% through a forum that apparently AVZ did not want to facilitate so they did it without us and nulified our right to the 15%. This after AVZ paid millions for the 75% - Smart move by AVZ to mess up on missing the email huh?

But surprisingly, in parallel AVZ is talking to the Government at the most senior levels about advancing this 15% - Go figure... How dumb - they miss the email from the Tribunal and waste their time talking to the President about something already done...

So to summarise A) We never had the 15% and B) We lost our right to it if at all - For this We lose 600m in market cap on that!!?

Someone please correct me as I have spent way too much time on this today.

On the contrary, this is about this:

The day we entered the ASX200 our short position increase 5x - the price on that day ? 95c

Why did we get shorted to begin with? Because we invest in the DRC and we all know africa is uncertain in the best of times . That is a shorters paradise.

Today we took away all that uncertainty and made the crucial mistake of addressing more uncertainty - Why Nigel? there was no need.. BUT what we didnt realise is acknowledging the uncertainty in its self creates an environment where buyers are less courageous and a few well placed significant sell side trades creates a stampede allowing for the undoing of this significant short-position. It should have been a short-squeeze, they got lucky...

That is what happened today and whoever soldout then sadly you got manipulated and i'd argue deservingly so given the lack of conviction.

Good investors buy for a reason, the intraday share price is irrelevant. There was no reason to sell today

I hope the new 120m shareholdings that entered today are here with more conviction. I can tell you most of that is the institutions that now will profit the other way at those shareholders expense.

A sad day for the ASX and its credibility...

Expand

The mining license is issued to Dathcom, not AVZ and AVZ by the worst chance would still own 60% at the moment (after CATH transaction, it would be decreased to 36%).
So this sentence would not stand 'Within that is legal ownership - you wouldnt award a license to someone that doesnt own it right?'.
AVZ owns the majority of Dathcom right now.

If the Dathomir Claim is 'nonsense', why would its name be listed as 'associates' on a DRC official website?
If you think Zi Jin steal the 15% and the DRC website shows its name correctly (and AVZ is trying to take it back), would it be possible that Dathomir's name is correctly listed as well?

I hope everything goes the way you said but it just does not explain the large decline today.
'Shorters' and 'Manipulation' would not bring AVZ down by this much.
AVZ Price at posting: 80.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
6 Upvote

1 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

TRP

Tissue Repairs soars nearly 32% on TGA approval for wound healing gel

RHK

Red Hawk upgrades Blacksmith with DSO mineral resource at the Eagle Deposit

ASX Market Open: ASX200 to rise for Friday session | July 26

IGO

IGO kicks off earn-in copper drilling on-site Encounter's Yeneena play as it adopts new identity

MIN

MinRes jumps 5% as the company meets production guidance – depressed iron ore prices be damned

NVA

Nova locks in NASDAQ US market listing at a value of only US$3.3M as ASX gets quieter and quieter

HRZ

Horizon firms up ore reserve for Boorara ahead of FY25 Q1 development decision

Capital raisings wrap: Brainchip, Ovanti, Lake and VHM

Nine's staff strike as Paris Olympic coverage begins

MND

Monadelphous inks $200M contract with Woodside to help build Pluto LNG – but will it make Scarborough cheaper?

There are more pages in this discussion • 12,832 more messages in this thread...

First 70086 Last

Add AVZ (ASX) to my watchlist