AVZ (ASX) Running discussion on SP

Originally posted by th3p4rk2: ↑

Just speculating but I'm not really expecting to hear anything until after the MMCS case is done and dusted which should be no more than 90 days from last hearing, around 26th April? Whilst initial reports suggest a positive outcome for Cominiere vs MMCS, the government may want this ticked off and all liabilities considered before making any rash decisions on our outstanding issues. Also the 5% they appear to have been gifted by MOP perhaps hangs in the balance as part of this case and would want to be sorted out either way before ML issued given that project ownership percentage is a factor in this process. Killing me waiting here and I am confident of a good outcome but not expecting it anytime soon, there's still way too much unknown for this to be even nearly over. Pretty frustrating being kept in the dark about what the hold up is with only questionable social media posts to draw assumptions from.

Expand

Originally posted by th3p4rk2: ↑

Just speculating but I'm not really expecting to hear anything until after the MMCS case is done and dusted which should be no more than 90 days from last hearing, around 26th April? Whilst initial reports suggest a positive outcome for Cominiere vs MMCS, the government may want this ticked off and all liabilities considered before making any rash decisions on our outstanding issues. Also the 5% they appear to have been gifted by MOP perhaps hangs in the balance as part of this case and would want to be sorted out either way before ML issued given that project ownership percentage is a factor in this process. Killing me waiting here and I am confident of a good outcome but not expecting it anytime soon, there's still way too much unknown for this to be even nearly over. Pretty frustrating being kept in the dark about what the hold up is with only questionable social media posts to draw assumptions from.

Expand

M L has nothing to do with the OWNERSHIP issues
The suspension in regards of M L matter
ANN by our so called MANAGEMENT

The Company regrets the continuation to the voluntary suspension and shares the
frustration held by its shareholders. However, the Company wishes to reiterate
that the actions taken by the Company were and continue to be necessary to
protect shareholder interests, whilst the Company has been addressing a series of
complex matters with the competent Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
Government authorities with respect to the award of the mining and exploration
rights and its ongoing interests in the Manono Project