Just to point out: NO-ONE on this thread has either:
1. Enough experience operations a mining business in DRC, or
2. Enough ACTUAL knowledge of the current activities re our permit, position of the board, position of other actors,
...to make any claim about what's "realistic".
You can't make a claim about something being "realistic" based on imagined, inferred or assumed facts. That's not being realistic, that's being imaginary.
Fact: Company has staked their professional liability on communicating to shareholders we have good legal title to 70% of the project.
IMO - the best long-term outcome for DRC is for AVZ to develop the project under the ownership split communicated by the company: project gets developed faster, with good community outcomes, and builds business confidence in DRC. There is zero benefit to DRC for having Zijin involved in the project, only a few corrupt pillows getting snacks.
AVZ Price at posting:
78.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
