Hows that 300% valuation coming for a company that doesnt have a...

Hows that 300% valuation coming for a company that doesnt have a mining licence?

I can't see how you think its worth more after the costs have gone up with all those lawyers and all?

How do you add into the valuation of a company that has sued the governmemt for a mining licence and for the % share of the project that they sold to someone else?

I think how you arrive at that is more compelling at this point in time and you will blindly defend it till you are black and blue in the face.

I do take note that in your post in an earlier thread when talking about costs YOU conveniently left out the year to date arguing your point.

Truth be told we are both on the sidelines including you the holder that cant trade your shares.