Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

AVZ

0.00%

78.0¢ avz minerals limited

About 6 weeks ago, you posted the following: As a current holder...

First 78643 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
cruiser51

6,898 Posts.

1911

17/08/23

17:03

Post #: 69401512
Share
Originally posted by GiddyYup ↑

Thanks Cruiser. I understand the ownership structure however this doesn't change the prerequisite requirements necessary to convene an EGM, only the rights to vote at the EGM. No EGM, no vote. Unfortunately that is what happened as AVZ have acknowledged. AVZs explanation as to how they overcame this is where the problems for them appear to lie.

Also please remember that although a contract can stipulate dispute resolution mechanisms these do not subordinate local legislation. Transfer of shares generally comes under corporations act or similar. Dathcom is a company incorporated in the DRC so depending on the nature of the case put before the DRC court they may have had the jurisdiction. They clearly thought that they did.

Also note that the court case didn't involve AVZ. If the parties involved didn't object to the DRC court hearing the case then in the absence of a jurisdictional challenge the court heard the case and ruled upon it. As such the ruling stands which is the current situation as we all know.

AVZ can seek remedy against Dathomir under the JV agreement which is it doing separately through the ICC as you have pointed out. This gets us back to the above issues of how AVZ overcame the "condition precedent" to get approval via an EGM which never occurred.

It may well be that AVZ decides to avoid pushing a case that the SPA was legally completed and instead focus their case on Dathomir's conduct given that they appear to have entered into a contract that they ought reasonably have known that they couldn't honor. Either way, since the contract was conditional and on face value that condition was never met, it will be a sh1te show.

Through all of this there is somebody at Dathcom company secretariat who will have skid marks in the pants.

Expand

About 6 weeks ago, you posted the following:

As a current holder I'm hoping that your information is more in-depth than my own and you may have some additional information on these issues than what I have available to me as another ill-informed non-holder. I don't usually post here on AVZ.

Let me ask you:

Why is the Dathomir 15% stake in dispute and how did AVZ overcome the three key obstacles to complete the transaction?

I am rather surprised you have suddenly become an expert on the subject.

Did you read the judgement of the Lubumbashi Tribunal?

Have you made yourself familiar with the Dathcom JV?

Did you find the info about the EGM?

Please stop fishing and inform yourself better on the subject.
AVZ Price at posting: 78.0¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
7 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

With financials holding the fort, materials must step up with some heavy lifting to stimulate stocks

RDN

If you thought lithium was dead, think again. The Pilbara will be central to the next upswing

STX

Strike Energy secures $153 million for Perth Basin gas projects

SBW

Shekel Brainweigh CEO Nir Leshem weighs in on AI adoption ahead of FY25

AML

Cultural heritage agreement puts Walford Creek exploration back on the map