not that it means that much but PMT correctly attributes Manono...

not that it means that much but PMT correctly attributes Manono to AVZ




The DRC and its corrupt actors can delay this as long as they want but at some point AVZ will be rewarded with a massive ICSID award, one which DRC has to either pay with cash or international assets.

Along that journey the mine will never get built, international funding will cease and the will slip away further into the extreme poverty it has.

Whilst we are faced with clowns and toilets, its important to keep a logical view. One that clear states
1) AVZ would have been trashed if it was trading, you only need to see peer lihtium participants to realise what this industry along with risk does to a share price
2) Whilst we lost 2 years of mine development, alot of players stopped mine development and production during this time. the capex outlay in this industry would have been very bad for a mine developer to accomodate
3) and most importantly, the DRC as a whole has nothing to gain with siding with Zinjin, it is only a select few that have taken the bribes that remain committed or blackmailed into continuing to tow the bs. This gets undone when ICSID rules, ICC liquidates the fine.. The only smart thing for DRC and Zinjin is to settle for an MOU where AVZ gets the south and equity in the north.

Contrary any of the pests that post here, there is no logical reason to do anything else... @@h00ts since you are one of these posters still committed to this forum and of the lot, the most credible due to history - i challenge you to present a logical reason why the DRC and Zinjin will proceed with the ICSID/ICC risk payable either in the shortterm or the long term