yet DigOil is able to seize DRC assets. I am not arguing it will...

yet DigOil is able to seize DRC assets. I am not arguing it will take time, the so called feel good post you refer to highlights the Option AVZ has for valuations at a future point in time. That's what DRC losing a enforceable court case does, gives AVZ a future valuation opportunity.

Furthermore DRC and US MOU puts pressure on this, what is worth more to the DRC, the rail corridor or this asset at the risk of turning away all western EV opportunities?

CAMI and Comminiere does not = DRC, there is a new Govenrment in place and DRC is notoriously chaotic across its gov subsidiaries

okay So your argument is to state DigOil which is a different case study all together is the reason to conclude the DRC wont abide by ICSID law at least for 6 years - okay if thats all you got

How about funding - whats your one example there?