Mothballing any project means you're not in the lowest quartile for opex costs.
FMG for was running for a number of months at 0 profit when the iron price tanked.
In fact - information fed to me at the time was they were running at a loss.
Had they mothballed operations due to low pricing, BHP, RIO, Vale would have swallowed that market share as they refined and reduced their opex costs.
Because FMG pushed through, brought down opex, when the iron price recovered they made bank.
IMO PLS is in a good position to be spat out the otherside and scoop a lot of the supply that hasn't come online/or is at the current level not marginal. The key as previously said, is to reduce their opex. It's a must. If they can bring that down then the expansions make sense. Flood the market and push the marginal producers out. For now, they are a marginal producer but i think there's a lot of potential if they get it right.
GXY is the other one i see coming out the otherside quite well - cash backing plays a large part in weathering the storms. They have no requirement to re-finance or take death spiraling debt, CR's etc. That said, i think they squandered their opportunity a little bit not using that cash earlier to be better positioned when the market turns.
just my thoughts.
SF2TH
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Running discussion on SP
Mothballing any project means you're not in the lowest quartile...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 59,888 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
78.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.752B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
AVZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable