My understanding was the $957M or let's say $1B for market size, means revenue. The Gilder report on the Weebit website is written that way.
Weebit-SEP-22_Gilder-Report-Flash-Flood-Coming-Non-volatile-Memory-Technology-RRAM.pdf (weebit-nano.com)
Right-hand column, page 5 of the PDF:
"The current size of the ReRAM market may seem insignificant to the big memory players like Samsung, Micron and SK Hynix, but the projected growth of the “flash flood” looms as a transformative opportunity. Even assuming Weebit Nano is able to command only one-third of the total ReRAM market by 2030, it would have a revenue-generation potential more than $300 million, equivalent to the company’s stock market capitalization in U.S. dollars today."
Clearly this report assumes $2.9B Embedded NVM, and $1B for ReRAM, and $300M for WBT are Revenue figures, not a market size where 1.5% is then applied. So the confusion is in the term "market size" being used interchangeably with "market revenue".
Which is it?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WBT
- Running discussion on SP
Running discussion on SP, page-2547
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6,728 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WBT (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$2.05 |
Change
0.020(0.99%) |
Mkt cap ! $389.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$2.01 | $2.07 | $1.99 | $390.7K | 192.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1659 | $2.05 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$2.07 | 18144 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1659 | 2.050 |
1 | 1594 | 2.040 |
2 | 21084 | 2.030 |
1 | 1594 | 2.020 |
2 | 31731 | 2.010 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.070 | 18144 | 3 |
2.080 | 11310 | 3 |
2.090 | 17800 | 2 |
2.100 | 28094 | 7 |
2.110 | 7919 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 01/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
WBT (ASX) Chart |