Just remember that Tesla issue was really a human error, not a problem with flash. Some idiot software engineer turned on logging & wrote tonnes of data to a small eMMC chip designed for storing the O/S, not the right place to store logs. Its not a problem with flash, Tesla used the wrong chip!
The NAND they were using was only 8GB and 3,000 program/erase cycles per block, or roughly 5 years.
The replacement unit is 64GB, so should now last 64 years? Or they could use off-board logging with 4TB SSDs..... so many options...
So whilst ReRAM could solve the solution, the other option is to just throw more capacity at it, like Tesla/NVIDIA did.
One day ReRam will have a big market share, but its very hard to take it away from Flash purely because its so cheap & plentiful... Can't wait to see a high capacity WBT chip..... might jump in then
Running discussion on SP, page-6995
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,247 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WBT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.55 |
Change
0.120(4.94%) |
Mkt cap ! $481.4M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.49 | $2.65 | $2.46 | $3.607M | 1.405M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 8185 | $2.53 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $2.55 | 14261 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WBT (ASX) Chart |