Share
10,543 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 566
clock Created with Sketch.
03/04/23
11:40
Share
Originally posted by Cosmoterios:
↑
oh, back to the Bitterwinter BS again. the problem is, they are a bunch of religious nutcases who offer their opinion. "The Ukrainian Constitution allowed the Parliament to call for new presidential elections in case of need, and the fact that the President had deserted his duties had created this need. Both Western and Ukrainian experts have expressed different opinions about the nature of the February 22 vote, acknowledging at the same time that the situation of a President fleeing his country was unprecedented." 1. He had not deserted his duties: if he had, he wouldn't be calling in and going on national TV (a few hours before the vote) to insist he was still the President and he won't resign. That is NOT sign of someone going AWOL. That is evidence of someone insisting he is the rightful and legal President of Ukraine, and 2. He didn't flee his country on 22nd Feb. He fled his country on 24th Feb after the vote and after the new regime issued arrest warrant against him. Now, go back to driving your taxi - take your other fake profile with you!!!
Expand
It outlines some facts which completely shatter the idea of the so called 'US Coup' you blokes keep lathering up over and which the only and most substantial 'evidence' you can offer is the famous 'phone call. Really compelling stuff that is.....not. If you had any brains you'd take note of the pertinent points, timelines, events, circumstances that series of articles summarises.