Russia Ukraine war, page-125322

  1. 9,935 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 614
    You studied physics, obviously not energy physics
    Australia cannot power its self via solar and wind, the costs are prohibitive, the land area required is enormous, and even then, the power can be produced at a fraction of the cost by coal, gas and nuclear.
    Which ever way you cut it doesnt have the density nor leverage and requires enormous resources in mining, fabrication and vast land area. Nothing green, clean or renewable.

    You have just quoted some figures, those kw/sq m numbers are dwarfed by the output produced by coal, gas, or nuclear. Fact. Plus their environmental footprint is a fraction of what is required by solar and wind. Fact Nor can wind and solar equipment be recycled. Fact

    Wind and solar are retrograde technologies


    https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/05/06/the-reason-renewables-cant-power-modern-civilization-is-because-they-were-never-meant-to/

    https://www.enseccoe.org/data/public/uploads/2021/04/nato-ensec-coe-the-hidden-costs-of-solar-photovoltaic-power-thomas-a.troszak.pdf
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.