Russia Ukraine war, page-200305

Logically, the head of NATO, that has billions at his disposal, some of which goes to a building full of people whose job it is to gather intelligence on a potential enemy would probably have better info than a disgruntled head of a private military, that spearheaded the invasion into Ukraine, AND ran a network of disinfo bot-farms for the Russian government.

Logically, a high-level Ukrainian politician that was present at the March 2022 Russia-Ukraine negotiations and actually saw the draft agreement, is probably a more reliable source of information than a disgruntled head of a private military, that spearheaded the invasion into Ukraine, AND ran a network of disinfo bot-farms for the Russian government. Remember what Dvyd Arakhamia had to say about that agreement? I do. Mentioned nothing about a "land grab" or anything else. Closest thing to a land grab that was in the draft agreement, was autonomy for DNR and LNR. I'll let you google what "autonomy" means. Take your time.