Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

@tangsYou cannot still think 'storm' meant 'to capture', it...

First 207285 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Okceg

8,860 Posts.

14

03/03/24

15:15

Post #: 72719185
Share

Originally posted by Okceg: ↑

Well, if that is the definition being used you are correct. I consider 'storm' to mean essentially a forceful attack.
Cambridge English dictionary gives a different definition which is how I understood the update:
to attack a place or building by entering suddenly in great numbers:The fortress was stormed by hundreds of soldiers.
It is also telling that, given Weeb's update trying to estimate when Krynky would be taken, his use of 'storm' was not talking about the actual capture and seems to follow the definition as above.

Expand

@tangs
You cannot still think 'storm' meant 'to capture', it would be impossible - see above. [broken record needs a new script]
given Weeb's update trying to estimate when Krynky would be taken, his use of 'storm' was not talking about the actual capture

Last edited by Okceg: 03/03/24
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

The Altcoin Landscape (Part 1): Key alternative cryptocurrencies to watch

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too

Making money: How many microcaps should be in an investor's portfolio?

Aussie inflation seemingly hit a 3 year low. So why's the ASX200 red?

There are more pages in this discussion • 37,938 more messages in this thread...

First 207285 Last