The common dominator leading into this war was perceived National Security by both sides , IMO,
with the treatment of Russian speakers in Donbas as a secondary issue.
The big question is: to what extent can a country bolster its National Security
if by doing so threatens the National security of a neighbour ?
We have seen an Indonesia & Malaysia's hostile reaction to AUKUS and that's a "long bow"
in comparison to others. And if AUKUS ever materialises it will be at least mid 2040s
before we see the first AUKUS Nuke Sub .
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/19/we-are-worried-indonesia-and-malaysia-express-concern-over-australias-nuclear-submarine-plan
Libertarians may well say that its none of their business but in Geopolitics
sphere's of influence and the power to project it is a valid currency.
While we may be hoodwinked into thinking that these AUKUS subs wont be Nuke Armed,
others in the region see it differently, IMO...hence the objection to them.
- Forums
- World Politics
- Russia Ukraine war
The common dominator leading into this war was perceived...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10,181 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online